?
Zitat aus qt-interest-Liste
> I want to switch from MFC to QT but keep the VS 2003 IDE. Is there any
> possibility to compile the Open Source version of QT with the MS C++
> 2003 compiler?
> Nope, sorry. Not unless you do the port, that is.
> I guess all you need to do is workout the QMAKESPECS for MSVC.net,
> that's all...I think you can get some hint from the QT 3.3.X free port
> to Windows. I'm sure someone will come up with this very soon...
There is also a small modification to do in metamakefile.cpp, and some
generators to add in qmake/generators.
I recently compiled Qt with the freely available VC++.net 2005 beta 2,
with some files imported from the QtWin project (I had to make some
small modifications).
I put all the required files here:
http://perso.numericable.fr/~jlloicjoly40/c++/patchQT4.0.0win.zip
Please not that those files are distributed along the GPL, and cannot be
used for non GPL project.
By the way, to answer some points I read in other threads:
- If I can afford a commercial compiler, I can afford a commercial Qt:
- If I have 1000€ to spend, I can afford one thing that cost 1000€,
not two.
- Commercial compilers can be available for free (VC++.net2003,
VC++.NET 2005 beta2 for instance)
- To have portable code, the best is to use the same compiler
- To have truely portable and higher quality code, the best is in fact
to use many compilers, even on only one platform.
I am sad to say that I tried to use mingw, but although functionnal this
is not my compiler of choice on windows: It is very slow to compile,
generate slow code,... Tying the use of GPL Qt on windows with mingw
will imply that GPL Qt programs will run slower that commercial
alternatives.
